ISO 17025 accredited systems
Testing operates inside an accredited laboratory quality framework rather than informal internal habits.
ISO 17025 • ALCOA+ • Independent QC Review
BioChroma operates under ISO 17025 accredited systems with cGMP conditions, ALCOA+ data integrity practices, independent QC review, and documented controls designed to support chemistry, microbiology, molecular biology, and stability programs.
Testing operates inside an accredited laboratory quality framework rather than informal internal habits.
Records are expected to remain attributable, legible, contemporaneous, original, accurate, complete, consistent, enduring, and available.
Analytical datasets undergo independent quality review before release.
Methods and operating conditions are selected with reference to USP, EP, AOAC, FDA BAM, USDA, cGMP, and ICH expectations where applicable.
BioChroma’s quality framework is designed for teams that need more than a marketing promise. The laboratory operates under ISO 17025 accredited systems, applies ALCOA+ data integrity practices, uses document control in BCAL-CO-XXXXXX format, and reviews analytical datasets through independent QC before release. The page is intentionally written like a quality manual summary so QA, regulatory, and technical reviewers can scan the controls, records language, and standards alignment without digging through marketing claims.
Quality Architecture
Controlled documents use the BCAL-CO-XXXXXX format so records can be identified, revision-managed, and reviewed without ambiguity.
Corrective and preventive action processes give the quality group a structured path for documenting, investigating, and following through on issues.
Internal audits check whether procedures and quality expectations are being maintained across departments over time.
Independent QC review helps confirm that the dataset and supporting record are ready for release and external review.
ALCOA+ Data Integrity
Each record should be tied to the person who created or reviewed it.
The record should remain readable and understandable throughout its useful life.
Data should be recorded at the time the work is performed, not reconstructed later.
The retained record should preserve the original observation, source, or first capture of the data.
The record should reflect the work truthfully and without unexplained alteration.
The dataset should include the full supporting record needed for review, not just the favorable result.
Records should follow a coherent sequence so reviewers can understand what happened and when.
Data should remain preserved in a durable form that supports later review.
Records should be retrievable when QA, regulatory, or technical review requires them.
Regulatory Standards
Compendial chemistry and microbiology references used where applicable to the method or test.
European pharmacopeial references used where the product program or method context calls for them.
Recognized analytical methods used when the matrix and decision context fit AOAC-aligned workflows.
Reference framework for microbiology and food-related methods where appropriate.
Applicable compendial references for food and agriculture-related testing programs.
Guidance framework for stability study planning, condition selection, and trend review.
Next step
Share your documentation, quality, or accreditation question and we will connect you with the right quality or technical contact.